Live Music
Archive
Librivox
Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland
Museum of Art
Internet
Arcade
Console Living Room
Open Library
American
Libraries
TV News
Understanding
9/11YOU are Narcissist’s Tradition, His Reflexive Self
Video Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
- Publication date
- 2022-10-02
- Usage
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
- Topics
- ontological insecurity, reflexive, self, anthony giddens, narcissist, psychopath, borderline, cluster B, histrionic, cptsd, complex trauma, victim, attachment, insecure, secure, safe base, dead mother, personal autonomy, self sufficiency, love, intimacy, style, disorder, aggression, destrudo, parentify, adult, child, abuse, withholding, emotions, world, life, people, objects, being, existence, trust, development, growth, identity, security, secure base, religion, tradition, cult, worshipper, god, divine, leader
- Language
- English
- Item Size
- 133.0M
Watch “Narcissist: No Basic Trust and Ontological Insecurity” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C43nEAb3tE
In the study of identity, reflexivity refers to the human capability of turning the attention of consciousness back upon itself—being aware of the
fact that we are aware, thinking about thinking, or more mundanely, perhaps, providing accounts of our selves.
Giddens’s model of selfhood consists of three components: the unconscious, practical consciousness, and self-reflexivity. The realm of the unconscious is of primary importance for the development of self—identity as it is here where relationships of basic trust are initiated.
The experience of trust at an unconscious level in infancy provides the individual with a secure orientation toward the world that protects her or him from engulfment when threats to identity inevitably come.
It is only in posttraditional societies that the self becomes a genuinely reflexive project. Traditions once provided people with fairly rigid and temporally constant points through which to navigate a sense of self and thus facilitated self-reflexivity within fairly narrow existential parameters; narrow because much of what might be questioned is effectively answered by the givens of tradition.
(Encyclopedia of Identity)
Further Readings
Adams, M. (2007). Self and social change. London: Sage.
Adkins, L. (2003). Reflexivity: Freedom or habit of
gender? Theory, Culture & Society, 20(6), 21–42.
Alexander, J. (1996). Critical reflections on “reflexive
modernization.” Theory, Culture & Society, 13(4),
133–138.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive
modernization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity.
Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy.
Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Plumridge, L., & Thomson, R. (2003). Longitudinal
qualitative studies and the reflexive self. International
Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(3),
213–222.
Threadgold, S., & Nilan, P. (2009). Reflexivity of
contemporary youth, risk and cultural capital. Current
Sociology, 57(1), 47–68.
Find and Buy MOST of my BOOKS and eBOOKS in my Amazon Store: https://www.amazon.com/stores/page/60F8EC8A-5812-4007-9F2C-DFA02EA713B3
In the study of identity, reflexivity refers to the human capability of turning the attention of consciousness back upon itself—being aware of the
fact that we are aware, thinking about thinking, or more mundanely, perhaps, providing accounts of our selves.
Giddens’s model of selfhood consists of three components: the unconscious, practical consciousness, and self-reflexivity. The realm of the unconscious is of primary importance for the development of self—identity as it is here where relationships of basic trust are initiated.
The experience of trust at an unconscious level in infancy provides the individual with a secure orientation toward the world that protects her or him from engulfment when threats to identity inevitably come.
It is only in posttraditional societies that the self becomes a genuinely reflexive project. Traditions once provided people with fairly rigid and temporally constant points through which to navigate a sense of self and thus facilitated self-reflexivity within fairly narrow existential parameters; narrow because much of what might be questioned is effectively answered by the givens of tradition.
(Encyclopedia of Identity)
Further Readings
Adams, M. (2007). Self and social change. London: Sage.
Adkins, L. (2003). Reflexivity: Freedom or habit of
gender? Theory, Culture & Society, 20(6), 21–42.
Alexander, J. (1996). Critical reflections on “reflexive
modernization.” Theory, Culture & Society, 13(4),
133–138.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive
modernization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity.
Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy.
Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Plumridge, L., & Thomson, R. (2003). Longitudinal
qualitative studies and the reflexive self. International
Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(3),
213–222.
Threadgold, S., & Nilan, P. (2009). Reflexivity of
contemporary youth, risk and cultural capital. Current
Sociology, 57(1), 47–68.
Find and Buy MOST of my BOOKS and eBOOKS in my Amazon Store: https://www.amazon.com/stores/page/60F8EC8A-5812-4007-9F2C-DFA02EA713B3
